A well documented religiously kept Site Diary is one of the best things you can do to protect the value of your work in a Payment dispute, yet it is one of the rarest things to find. And I’m not talking about a normal calendar diary in which you scribble a few notes here and there. I am talking about a diary specifically there to capture the great number of details and key events that happen every day on your site.
In most payment disputes the parties will argue a different (very different) version of events. It is important that you can prove your version. The way to do that is to keep a daily site diary. If you can demonstrate that you record events each day, then this document becomes ‘contemporaneous evidence’ that you can use in adjudication or other proceedings.
So what are some of the things you should record? Here are some that will make all the difference in a payment dispute:
Contract Work done v Variation Work done
The biggest argument for non payment is either ‘the work is part of your scope’ or ‘It was never approved or requested’.
You should detail the contract work done by reference to your scope of works. That way there can no argument that it is contract work. By contract you can then record the variation work done. This work will not be found in the scope of works and so is additional. The final things is to record how the variation was requested; written or oral. Record who requested it, and if written include the details of the written instruction.
Old Drawings V New Drawings
Another massive are of argument is revised drawings that require additional work. The debtor will argue that the new drawings should not attract any additional cost. The best thing to do is diarise the date you were issued new drawings and note the drawings they replaced. You should also send your client a quote to carry out the additional work in the drawing, and diarise that too. In this way you can follow how the scope required grew, and the dates it grew, and by what value. Many times clients will try to insist that the new drawing is the one issued all along and that there never was an earlier version. A good diary will sort that one out.
So often a client will give numerous oral directions that add up to a whole range of additional work. What needs to be detailed here are all those directions that create a variation. That way the client cannot use the usual tactic of simply denying that the work was ever requested. If you can match the date the request was made with other evidence about the work, then one document backs up the other. This makes for great evidence.